Cadillac & LaSalle Club Discussion Forum

Cadillac & LaSalle Club Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 24, 2023, 10:13:30 PM

Title: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 24, 2023, 10:13:30 PM
Extra, Extra, read all about it. De Ja vue all over again. An approved replacement for R-134A has hit the market place. It is R-456A. Currently selling widely in Europe and available on this continent. Currently priced at 340.36 Euros for 12 Kg. That's a bargain priced of only $14.05 per pound.  This is probably one ho's price will go up since 45% of the blend is the R-134A which will be discontinued.
I am certainly glad that I am retired and not still on the Hamster wheel that the refrigeration industry seems (to me) to have become.
Greg Surfas
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: fishnjim on January 25, 2023, 10:44:44 AM
Kid, I don't think it's the industry that's the problem.   
It's the environmental bureaucrats and UN ozone "police" out there trying to "save the planet", per se.
Anything with a first number 4 or 5 is a blend per the naming protocol.

When I retired 1234YF was hot and heavy, but as far as I know hasn't made the panacea splash that was expected.  And two biggies tied up the market.   All the equipment coming out of China into the domestic market has cheaper flammable refrigerants, so somethings not level in the field.
The company I worked for built a 134a plant and it was well over 10 years before it broke even with all the shenanigans in the industry back then trying to decide on "the" replacement.  Then suddenly the price spiked and things eased.   So it's a game, not of skill, but luck apparently and marketing and political positioning.
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 25, 2023, 11:25:14 AM
Jim,
I don't know if it is the first time, but I agree with you.  Just to add some more insanity into the mix, R-456A is a blend of R-134A and HFO-1234yf. How about that. Again, this is suppposed to be a replacement for R-34A in the "older" systems that use it.  As an Engineer who's specialty is in refrigeration and air conditioning most of what goes on with these refrigerants clearly indicates a real lack of understanding on the part of those who legislate these changes.
When R-11 and R-12 were being phased out operators were supposed to just buy new equipment. Most of the knowledgeable ones just "tightened up" their refrigeration systems and MANY are still in operation some 50 years later.
Fret no, this will continue to go. Again, glad to be retired and out of the mix.
Greg Surfas
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: Cadillac Jack 82 on January 25, 2023, 01:10:33 PM

Will that mean a system needs to be fully converted over similar to how R-12 units were converted to R-134a?  Luckily my 55 still uses R12 but boy is that stuff $$$$$ (100 a pound at my mechanic).
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 25, 2023, 04:29:53 PM
Supposedly that will be a"drop in" for systems ORIGINALLY DESIGNED FOR R-134A. $100/pound is probably about where ALL the replacement refrigerants will end up in the ext few years.
Greg Suras
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: 79 Eldorado on January 25, 2023, 08:28:40 PM
R12 destroyed the Ozone layer due to attachment of Chlorine which was particularly bad because the Chlorine acted like a catalyst so it wasn't a "one and done" reaction. Result we fry due to UV radiation.

R134a - Has a higher GWP - Global Warming potential so a relatively high contribution to green house gases. Result we cook the earth as the incoming solar radiation wavelength changes like in a greenhouse.

1234yf - Much lower GWP but breaks down into a "forever chemical": Result: We poison ourselves as it gets into the food and water.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistent_organic_pollutant
"Persistent organic pollutants (POPs), sometimes known as "forever chemicals", are organic compounds that are resistant to environmental degradation through chemical, biological, and photolytic processes."

So a mixture of R134a and 1234yf does not sound like a new or a good solution. That's why "natural refrigerants" like propane are still being considered in some parts of the world. Propane has a very low GWP, contains no Chlorine and is not a "Forever chemical". It is of course flammable but if you replace R12 or R134a with what seems to be the automotive drop-in, a mix of propane and isobutane, the total charge is cut by 40 to 50% of the original charge. So yes it's flammable but you aren't using much and it's not the only dangerous/flammable substance in a car.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HC-12a
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: Moody on January 25, 2023, 09:11:25 PM
Man, I lucked out buying 18 cans of DuPont R12 for $150 awhile back. Hopefully I can bypass 134 all together. Maybe 456 will work better than 134.
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 25, 2023, 10:40:51 PM
If I did not make it clear, R-456A IS NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE R-134A THAT HAS BEEN CHARGED INTO A PREVIOUSLY R-12 SYSTEM.  IT IS FOR SYSTEMS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED FOR R-134A
Greg Surfas
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: Moody on January 26, 2023, 07:27:20 PM
Yeah, I missed that detail. Thanks for the clarification.
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 26, 2023, 08:01:09 PM
I believe that if you do the research you will find the vast majority of the phased out chemicals (R—11, 12, 22 and 134A) were used as spray can propellants, foam blowing agents solvents and "dusters. Refrigeration took the hit
Greg Surfas
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: bcroe on January 27, 2023, 09:11:53 PM
Greg, thanks for the update. 

When I installed a junk yard recovered AC in a 64 Mercury,
R12 was a dollar a pound. First I saw the cans going to 15
oz, 14 oz.  Then huge price increases.  Finally they told us
to throw away the old stuff and use something new that they
had current patents on.  Now they are doing it again. 

It is pretty obvious that the old idea of serving customers at
the lowest cost practical has been replaced with as much
profit as possible, this in many industries.  There are a lot of
reasons given to justify changes, including why we can not
use propane-butane, they are not the actual motivation.  It
did not prevent me from using it.  Bruce Roe
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: EAM 17806 on January 31, 2023, 12:02:14 PM
Quote from: Moody on January 25, 2023, 09:11:25 PMMan, I lucked out buying 18 cans of DuPont R12 for $150 awhile back. Hopefully I can bypass 134 all together. Maybe 456 will work better than 134.
DAVID:  You lucked IN not OUT!
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 31, 2023, 01:24:49 PM
Hey I lucked out last year by buying a 30 pound "jug" for only $1,200.00
Greg Surfas
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: jwwseville60 on January 31, 2023, 01:41:08 PM
I just bought a 30lb R12 can. Well worth it.
The US Military has millions of pounds of R12, you just have to buy the big 30-60 lb cans.
They are NOT going to convert the thousands of trucks and vehicles. No way.

The story I got from some US Army veterans was that R134A was cheaper to make than R12.
Thats the real reason for the change, not so much the environment.
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: Eric DeVirgilis CLC# 8621 on January 31, 2023, 02:05:36 PM
The story I got long ago was that Dupont's patent had expired on R12 and lobbied to have it banned. R134a was supposed to solve all issues where R12 was concerned but now 134A is a problem. Regardless I'm not buying any of this shell game nonsense and none of the dire weather predictions made decades ago ever came to pass. I place little stock in paid liars masquerading as scientists no matter how eloquent their sermons.   

Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: "Cadillac Kid" Greg Surfas 15364 on January 31, 2023, 02:42:24 PM
A whole lot of urban myths around the phasing in and out of ALL refrigerants that seem to have their origin "in the either",  it is what it is and just like a "few" other issues living with it, for me (although I might not agree with the outcome) is a whole lot easier on my serenity than regurgitating the issue. 
Greg Surfas
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: 2manycars on January 31, 2023, 07:50:40 PM
I gutted out the entire Climate Control system from my 64 and had the entire thing rebuilt by Original Air in Tampa. Since my car will reside in Florida, and my friend here in NJ has R12 at his shop, I elected to stick with R12 on the rebuild. Only the steel line to the condenser is not redone, since it only needs a flush with lacquer thinner. Had the heater recored. In the end it's good that I stuck with R12, because the evaporator was bad, and you can't get a new one the correct physical size. The new one is just a bit smaller, which means less capacity. I had to stuff that end of the box with dumdum so it wouldn't have air leaking past it instead of through it. End of Feb it goes in to be charged up. I don't know the cost yet, but whatever it is, it gets done.
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: 79 Eldorado on January 31, 2023, 10:23:23 PM
Quote from: jwwseville60 on January 31, 2023, 01:41:08 PMThe story I got from some US Army veterans was that R134A was cheaper to make than R12.
Thats the real reason for the change, not so much the environment.
John,
That's absolutely not true. The R12 to R134a replacement took a Herculean effort. It was very difficult to find a lubricant which worked well and would replace simple mineral oil for R12. Compressor bearings had to be improved and virtually every GM condenser needed to have better performance to make the R134a system function similar to the R12 systems they replaced. The person who believed it was all about cost to make the refrigerant was misinformed.

Scott
Title: Re: Approved replacement for the soon to be phased out R-134a.
Post by: jwwseville60 on February 01, 2023, 08:47:24 AM
Scott

You may be right.
It went from low pressure R12 to high pressure R134A.
But something doesn't add up considering the environment.