I get that they are basically just starting points but is it logical that the average "starting point" for a 1983 Coupe deVille would be higher than for a 1983 Fleetwood Brougham coupe? The Hagerty difference right now is only $300 in DeVille's favor but go to NADA and the average retail value of a 1983 Coupe deVille is much much higher, $4,900 for Coupe deVille versus just $1,925 for FB coupe. All else constant, I just don't see why the Fleetwood Brougham should be worth less and certainly not 60% less as with NADA value.
The relative values quoted of those two models makes no sense whatsoever. I remember the same thing occurring years ago regarding valuations of '50s Sixty Specials compared to Series 62 Sedans.
That sort of sloppiness again makes one question that accuracy/validity of content.
Lol at a comment about the styling of late model Cadillacs.‘Looks like it was designed by a demented origami nerd’In addition to being funny, it is in my humble opinion, also accurate.I think this alone excludes most modern Cadillacs from collectibility rankings.I would give them a B-