G'day Billy,I totally agree that the fitting of Seat Belts in older cars is one of the best additions that can be made, but there is one matter that needs to be considered, and that is the routing of the inner webbing, which the buckle is attached to.The construction of the seat base in many cars, especially those made by GM, does not allow for a straight-line path for the belt webbing, as it has to travel under the seat back, then up and over the seat base before heading to the floor.I looked at fitting belts to my ’60 CDV, and the lip at the back of the seat base is very high, and “sharpâ€. (first picture) The belt that goes there would need to have a direct path to the floor, thereby requiring cutting through the seat frame, as is with the ’69 sedan, and then a sock sewn in to protect the webbing from abrading. The ’69 already had factory seat belts fitted, and the seat frame had the required “hole†through the springs to cater for the belts.If you look at later model cars, most will have a plastic “ferrule†protecting the webbing.Plus, when fitting the belts, go for the three point Lap/Sash, as these will protect your chest from destroying your valuable steering wheel and horn ring in the unfortunate event of being involved in a nasty prang.Bruce. PS. For those with a 2 door car, when fitting seat belts, then one must fit seat back latches to stop the seat back from falling forward.
While some manufacturers offered belts in the mid 50's, several states required belts before they became factory standard equipment.